![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sereneorangeHoly crap! Nadya Suleman (woman who gave birth to a litter of 8) is requesting online donations on her website.
I support a woman's right to have as many damn children as she wants. I would prefer that she at least TRY to not have more children than she can take care of. She already received federal aid to the tune of $500 a month prior to the 8 new children. I am not sure, but I bet that amount is going up.
I don't think accidentally having children when you cannot afford them is a great idea either (btw, that was me. I had no business having Connor when I could hardly support myself at age 23 but am doing fine now) however, there is something especially disgusting to me about going out and having medical procedures done to have more children when you ALREADY cannot take care of the ones you have. Also, if you have disabled children at home, having more is not a great idea. It would be best to focus on the wellbeing of the children in need, not have a litter more to care for.
However, the more people that choose to throw money at this sideshow freak, the less money she will be needing from the federal government.
I take a small joy in the idea of her being covered in baby spit up for the next year.
I support a woman's right to have as many damn children as she wants. I would prefer that she at least TRY to not have more children than she can take care of. She already received federal aid to the tune of $500 a month prior to the 8 new children. I am not sure, but I bet that amount is going up.
I don't think accidentally having children when you cannot afford them is a great idea either (btw, that was me. I had no business having Connor when I could hardly support myself at age 23 but am doing fine now) however, there is something especially disgusting to me about going out and having medical procedures done to have more children when you ALREADY cannot take care of the ones you have. Also, if you have disabled children at home, having more is not a great idea. It would be best to focus on the wellbeing of the children in need, not have a litter more to care for.
However, the more people that choose to throw money at this sideshow freak, the less money she will be needing from the federal government.
I take a small joy in the idea of her being covered in baby spit up for the next year.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:18 pm (UTC)The assumption being that she will only request as much as she needs? Like "Well, I needed $1000 per month for my litter, but I got $950 in donations, so I just need $50, okay?"
She'll probably save up the extra money so that she can get the procedure done again, and go for an even 20.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:52 pm (UTC)There's a photo there. This week's cover of Life & Style also has photos of octomom and Angelina side-by-side so you can really see it.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 03:12 pm (UTC)I am, however, convinced that this woman is FUCKING CRAZY.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 03:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:24 pm (UTC)i knew i've seen it somewhere.
you never can be sure, but to me she looks different on the newer pictures.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:07 pm (UTC)1. She should be killed or sterilized (I prefer the former).
2. Someone had to pay for the fertility clinic stuff and plastic surgery. Those people need to be killed, too.
Oh, and anyone who gives her donations is guilty too.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:30 pm (UTC)People seeing others are giving her alot of money does nothing but encourage other people to do the same thing so they can get attention & money. The donors are just as guilty.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:32 pm (UTC)and I am fine with them being guilty. As long as the tax payers are not burdened with her unruly ass
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 06:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:18 pm (UTC)You are a bad person.
shame on you.
What happened to your soul?
Does it hurt? Can you feel the empty hole where you soul should be?
I hope you get a rash.
You are evil.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 04:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 06:59 pm (UTC)Pregnant alien queens possess an immense ovipositor on their lower torso, similar to a queen termite's, which is responsible for creating facehugger eggs. The queen is able to detach from the ovipositor. When attached to her ovipositor, the queen is supported by a "biomechanical throne" that consists of a lattice of struts resembling massive insect legs. Unlike insect queens, there appears to be no need for drones to fertilize an alien queen's eggs.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 05:09 pm (UTC)Its ridiculous..
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-12 07:00 pm (UTC)